Rule-based findings for software versions, patch baselines and port policies across Windows/Linux.
Findings turn raw signals (software inventory, patch status, listening ports, and security posture checks) into a prioritized remediation list. Instead of hunting through dashboards, you get a small set of rule-matched items that explain what’s wrong, why it matters, and what the next action should be.
Software rules let you detect known-bad or out-of-policy versions at scale. Instead of manual spot checks, you define what is acceptable and let findings show you where the estate deviates. This is especially useful during zero-days, where “where is X installed?” and “which versions?” must be answered quickly.
Patch baselines help you keep systems aligned with your maintenance rhythm. Instead of looking at patch data as a raw list, a baseline yields findings such as “missing critical updates”, “stale patch level”, or “host is outside the allowed update age”.
Start with a broad baseline (age-based) and refine to role-based baselines over time (servers vs endpoints, production vs test).
Port policies catch risky listeners and unexpected exposure. You can define “deny” or “flag” rules and get findings whenever a system starts listening on a port that is not approved for its purpose or environment.
Findings are meant to be operational: a short list that matches your policies, not a wall of telemetry. This makes it easier to triage, delegate, and keep momentum during busy operational cycles.
Because findings are rule-based, they become explainable. You can show what rule triggered, when it triggered, and how it was resolved. This is valuable for audits, internal controls, and post-incident reviews.